1. Home
  2. Blogs
  3. Cricket

August 7, 2025

“But He Didn’t Win a Test Match…”: Brad Haddin Questions Bumrah’s Match-Winning Impact

“But He Didn’t Win a Test Match…”: Brad Haddin Questions Bumrah’s Match-Winning Impact
Follow us on WhatsApp for latest updates!
WhatsApp

Former Australia wicket‑keeper Brad Haddin sparked a debate recently by asserting that Jasprit Bumrah, despite being a top-tier bowler, did not actually contribute in the win during the India test match against England at the Oval.

On the YouTube podcast Willow Talk, Haddin shared his personal observation: “He didn’t win a Test match. Siraj stood up when he had to... they still can play without Bumrah.”

He praised Mohammed Siraj's exceptional performance for his impressive 23 wicket haul in the series. He implied that Siraj was the true match-winner.

When reflecting on a broader narrative in India's bowling dynamic, Haddin believes that newer pace options are increasingly earning the spotlight. Haddin talks about how match-winning performance, often defined by decisive breakthroughs, can overshadow elite skill or consistency.

  • Bumrah’s challenge: The discussion raises the question of how contributions are valued—masterclass control versus game-defining impact.
     
  • Siraj’s rise: It also signals the growing confidence in India’s fast-bowling reserves and depth.

While Bumrah’s brilliance is widely acknowledged, Haddin’s critique invites a deeper look at what is considered truly “match-winning” in modern cricket. Let me know if you'd like a stat-by-stat comparison between Bumrah and Siraj from the series or expert reactions to this shift.


Related Post